With Such Words
if you aren't a hypocrite, your moral standards aren't high enough
Mansfield Park: Chapter 5 
8th-Jun-2013 01:38 pm
talibusorabat: A white man with large goggles "thinking thinky thoughts" (Dr. Horrible: Thinky Thoughts)
Chapter 4 discussion

One of the things that's so interesting to me about the Bertram sisters and Fanny is the active/passive dichotomy. On a superficial level, the sisters appear to be active and Fanny passive, but there are ways in which the sisters are passive too. The line that sticks out to me is ...before he had been at Mansfield a week, {Julia} was quite ready to be fallen in love with. Julia herself has no sense of being in love, or that she herself should be in love, only that Henry Crawford is agreeable and therefore he can fall in love with her. (Much like Maria is engaged to Mr. Rushworth because he is in love with her, and Lady Bertram is married to Sir Thomas because he fell in love with her.)

But it's not a case of these women have been socialized to see themselves as objects. Maria and Julia are the passive recipients of men's affections, but at the same time, the men themselves are the objects. Miss Bertram's engagement made him in equity the property of Julia... (And poor Maria indeed. This is why love matches are important.)


Unrelated, but I love that Henry isn't handsome, and how we witness the transformation charm can make on a person's appearance. It's not "beauty's only skin deep", but rather an acknowledgement that personality is as much a factor in a person's physical attractiveness as clear skin / symmetrical features / nice teeth / other socially recognized physical characteristics.


Henry really is dastardly likeable. He's perceptive, wry, just the right amount of self-effacing. Mary is too. In a way, they're almost set up to be the protagonists of the story, being immediately likeable to the reader and with a clearly established pattern for their character arcs in their cynicism regarding marriage.

Can't quite articulate my thoughts on the in/out discussion between Tom, Edmund, and Mary, but I did like it. (Also, LMAO, Edmund is such a know-it-all.)
Comments 
9th-Jun-2013 12:23 am (UTC)
tigerlily: Tara smiling (Tara smiling)
It's an interesting dichotomy. People can't be wholly passive or active, even if their roles seem to demand it. I imagined that Maria did try to get Mr. Rushworth because she thought him the most suitable match, but she couldn't do much beyond be pleasing in his eyes and receive approval from both families. And that Julia was hoping to do the same thing. Even when agency is restricted and people must act without seeming to act, it's difficult to stop people from seeing themselves as subjects.

Humans are social creatures in general, so I like how the Crawford's are built to be very good at socializing and social politics. They couldn't get away with saying what they said if they didn't act charming about it. I think it's not just personality, but the kind of personality that knows how to be charming in the right circumstances, that is very well adapted to their environment. I think he and Mary could have had those traits but displayed them in the wrong way, but they didn't.

The in/out discussion was fun; it also showed a kind of ambiguity for Fanny's role. The Bertrams' don't seem to know what is planned for her exactly, since she's not to be the lady their daughters are, but she is family and a lady. They haven't known all along beyond that she would be provided for in some way; they thought she would be with Mrs. Norris at first, and they thought it again when she was fifteen. Of course she is younger too. It's conceivable that what happens later is what was planned after Mrs. Norris wouldn't take her the second time: that after at least one daughter was taken care of, Fanny could be 'out'.
13th-Jun-2013 07:34 pm (UTC)
talibusorabat: In deep sleep hear sond cat vomit hairball somwhere will find in morning (Quotes: Hairball)
Even when agency is restricted and people must act without seeming to act, it's difficult to stop people from seeing themselves as subjects.

YES. I want to emblazon this across every discussion of women in history, or discussions of women in historical fiction.


The ambiguity of Fanny's role is interesting. I think, had events in the novel not gone the way they did, she might have ended up like that one woman in Emma (blanking on her name) who was single and had to care for her mother. I doubt, with Sir Thomas' consciousness of social class, Mrs. Norris' dislike, and Lady Bertram's apathy, that even Edmund could get Fanny to come "out" (especially as he doesn't even understand the concept). I think Fanny would have spent her life as a companion for Lady Bertram, with Sir Thomas occasionally thinking it's time for her to get married, but not excessively concerned about it because Fanny does take care of his wife.
13th-Jun-2013 09:38 pm (UTC)
tigerlily: Buffy gazing at the viewer lying down (Buffy gazing at the viewer lying down)
Exactly. I don't think this erases oppression at all, but people often either use it that way or use oppression to erase agency.

It's probable. I just think if someone else did visit, they might be an influence somehow. Fanny came out before Maria's disgrace and Tom's illness. That was related to the Crawfords, if I remember it right, so I think it's possible for someone else to trigger it too. But the default situation means your suggestion is the most likely.

This page was loaded Jun 23rd 2025, 10:23 pm GMT.